CWC 9th STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 15TH FEBRUARY 2001
Present: P. Adenwalla, D Brunskill, H Closs, B de Sarem, G. Glover, B. Hodge, J Hodge, B Leung, K Leung, I Owers, K Whittam, K Whitehead, K. Swindles, M. Swindles
Apologies: J Dawson, E Williamson
1. Minutes of meeting of 30th January adopted.
2. Constitution:
Discussion of draft 2 of constitution. Number of amendments agreed :-
3. D.B. gave a report on the interim forum meeting on 6th February. J.H. asked D.B. if he could give a report on the area definition. D.B. said if he was going to do that he wished to leave the Chair and asked for someone to take over. I.O. took over Chair. D.B. said it had been the Steering Groups decision that the issue of the consultation area definition should not be re-opened with Southwark unless anything in LBSs response to the meeting provided an opportunity to do and therefore JH had quite improperly raised it at the interim forum meeting on 6th February. The chair asked the meeting if it wished to debate this matter. JH said that in any event she wished to respond to what had just been said by D.B. following the decision of CWG referred to by D.B. he had received an e-mail from Adam Faulkener of LBS in which a different area definition was proposed and which closely matched the definition subsequently endorsed by the CWG Committee. This he had passed on to J.H. and provided exactly the opportunity referred to by the Committee. When J.H had tried to raise this with Chris Horne from LBS at the interim forum no support had been received from D.B. or G.G even when it came to a vote. J.H. said she had felt very isolated in trying to promote a CWG decision and did not wish to be in that situation again. Debate on this matter then closed and D.B. returned to the Chair.
4. Vision Statement: Discussion of draft 2 of Vision statement. B.H. produced a separate, shorter document saying need something which will catch peoples attention and is punchy. View was that should have both documents - the longer version as a definitive statement of CWGs aims and vision and the shorter version for widespread distribution and perhaps for use on posters and leaflets.
Discussion of Vision Statement draft 2 produced a number af amendments which
were agreed;-
Vision Questionnaire discussed and pointed out that J.D. had done a considerable amount of work on a questionnaire and should be involved in this.
Number of amendments agreed:
5. Office Developments. Discussion re possibility of admin assistant discussed. D. B. and I.O. had considered this and the employment of an admin assistant had been costed @£15.000 on a part-time basis. D.B. had raised this with LBS and Steve Platts had not given a wholly negative response. A job description would hopefully be circulated at next meeting.
6. Local Democracy Commisssion- D.B. reported that this was to consult on the structure of LBS and whether we should have a Mayor. Those sitting on it had to have no political party allegiance. He had been asked to sit on it by Councillor Partridge. He would not accept if CWG thought there was any conflict and he should not do so. The meeting took the view it was entirely separate and D.B.should accept if he wished to do so.
7. Willowbrook Centre- the centre is very short of people to sit on its management committee. E.M. had asked that this be reported in case anyone was interested.
8. Public meeting- agreed to put it back to 20th March. H.C. to draft leaflets for meeting.
9. Next meeting of Steering Committee - Wednesday 28th February @ 7.30pm Alfred Salter School. This would be to finalise the constitution and for for meeting rehearsal.
Canada
Water Campaign Home
Previous
Steering Committee Bulletin
13 Next
Steering Committee